Current:Home > NewsNorth Carolina judge properly considered jurors’ request in murder trial, justices decide-LoTradeCoin
North Carolina judge properly considered jurors’ request in murder trial, justices decide
View Date:2024-12-23 21:10:02
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina judge properly used his discretion in declining to provide testimony transcripts to jurors deliberating in a murder trial, the state Supreme Court has ruled.
A majority of justices on Thursday overturned the state Court of Appeals’ order of a new trial for Tevin Demetrius Vann.
Vann was convicted in 2019 of first-degree murder in 2016 death of Ashley McLean, who was found dead inside a Wilmington hotel room. The jury also found Vann guilty of felony murder of McLean’s unborn child and robbery with a dangerous weapon. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole.
While Superior Court Judge Henry Stevens provided to jurors other trial-related documents, including a transcript of Vann’s interview with detectives, he declined to give them the opportunity to review trial testimony of Vann, a police detective and the medical examiner.
Stevens told jurors “it’s your duty to recall their testimony. So you will have to remember that. We’re not – we can’t provide a transcript as to that.”
A Court of Appeals panel determined in 2022 that Stevens’ decision was prejudicial error against Vann, particularly because his testimony differed from his earlier interrogation with police when he admitted to striking McLean and fleeing the hotel room with her cell phone. On the stand, he asserted he did not attack McLean and only previously confessed to avoid being charged with murder.
In Thursday’s opinion backed by five court members, Associate Justice Phil Berger wrote there was no prejudicial error because the case record showed the trial court “understood and properly exercised its discretion.” He cited in part how Stevens handled previous requests from the deliberating jurors.
Associate Justice Anita Earls wrote a dissenting opinion, saying a new trial was proper because it was clear Stevens believed he could not provide the transcripts of Vann’s testimony, which she said was crucial and central to the case.
In a separate opinion, Associate Justice Allison Riggs wrote that while Stevens erred on the request, it was wrong to order a new trial because there lacked a reasonable possibility that jurors would have reached a different result based on other evidence against Vann.
veryGood! (783)
Related
- Prayers and cheeseburgers? Chiefs have unlikely fuel for inexplicable run
- Viola Davis achieves EGOT status with Grammy win
- U.S. women's soccer tries to overcome its past lack of diversity
- Marie Kondo revealed she's 'kind of given up' on being so tidy. People freaked out
- Queen Elizabeth II's Final 5-Word Diary Entry Revealed
- 'Black on Black' celebrates Black culture while exploring history and racial tension
- Marie Kondo revealed she's 'kind of given up' on being so tidy. People freaked out
- We break down the 2023 Oscar Nominations
- Florida Man Arrested for Cold Case Double Murder Almost 50 Years Later
- What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend viewing
Ranking
- Federal judge orders Oakland airport to stop using ‘San Francisco’ in name amid lawsuit
- 'Wait Wait' for Feb. 4, 2023: With Not My Job guest Billy Porter
- While many ring in the Year of the Rabbit, Vietnam celebrates the cat
- Reneé Rapp wants to burn out by 30 — and it's all going perfectly to plan
- US overdose deaths are down, giving experts hope for an enduring decline
- Here are six podcasts to listen to in honor of Martin Luther King Jr. Day
- In 'Everything Everywhere,' Ke Huy Quan found the role he'd been missing
- 5 takeaways from the Oscar nominations
Recommendation
-
Olympic Skier Lindsey Vonn Coming Out of Retirement at 40
-
In 'Everything Everywhere,' Ke Huy Quan found the role he'd been missing
-
Billy Porter on the thin line between fashion and pain
-
Salman Rushdie's 'Victory City' is a triumph, independent of the Chautauqua attack
-
Digital Finance Research Institute Introduce
-
'How to Sell a Haunted House' is campy and tense, dark but also deep
-
'Shrinking' gets great work from a great cast
-
LBJ biographer Robert Caro reflects on fame, power and the presidency